Reaction Rolls Are Smarter Than You

-

 


Why, Aaron, what an overly clickbait title you have, right?

Reaction rolls.  If you've come across this blog, the likelihood that you know not only what reaction rolls are but also exactly how to use them is staggeringly high.  For the sake of everyone else, this is the idea.

If you're unsure how a creature is going to react to the player characters, you roll two six-sided dice.  The higher the result of the roll, the more favorable they are to helping the player characters.  It uses a bell curve, so typically 7-9 is your fairly neutral average.  This is the chart from back in the early days.


It may not be a surprise to anyone, but I don't use this chart exactly as it's written.  While I see the purpose of multiple rolls, I favor a single one, and I use it more than just for monsters.

2-5 Extreme hostility
6-7 Somewhat hostile
8-9 Neutral
10-11 Favorable
12 Helpful

One may ask, "but Aaron!  This is completely random!  Why can't we consider external factors, such as how likable you are and stuff like that?"

By golly, you sure as hell can!  Several OSR systems take this into account, suggesting that you add the Charisma modifier of the lead character / speaker to help determine the result.  In OSR games, the highest modifier you can get is a +3.  This means that a character with +3 Charisma would have to roll snake eyes to get the shit beat out of them on my chart.  I would reflect this with Fifth Edition by halving the character's Charisma modifier and rounding it up.  Or using that godawful persuasion roll (gross).

Secondly, you can also take into consideration any faction-related affinity they may have toward you, or whether they hate you because you burned down their last swamp (don't ask me how that works).  You can use modifier to represent that to add to the roll.

So, you're using reaction rolls.  Here's where it gets interesting, though.  Say your party just encountered a patrol from a tribe of bloodthirsty orcs.  For one reason or another, the party decides to greet them rather than shoot them dead.  Now, you don't want to be a total dick and just say "Well, roll for initiative," do you?  (actually you totally can and I don't judge you for it)  Time for a reaction roll?

Wow, a 12!  This begs the question: what made these orcs so giddy that they wanted to help this li'l old party?  These orcs could be nothing more than a random encounter you rolled, so maybe you had absolutely nothing planned.  Well, shit, son!  Time to improvise.  Maybe the patrol is actually a band of renegades that seeks revenge on the tribe.  Maybe they're a troupe of wandering adventurers raised by a benevolent Elf (TMNT style?).  This is your chance to fill in a corner of the world that you didn't know you needed to fill.  Am I asking you to change/create things in your world on the fly?  Hell yes, I am.

This is why reaction rolls are awesome.  Not only do they take away the arbitrary dictation of the GM just saying yea or nay, but they also provide a means by which you can add depth to the world that you may not have thought of before.  This is an incredibly useful tool for dungeon crawls, for more socially oriented games, for just about anything you can think of.

Why was the Baron so incredibly hostile to us today?  Maybe he found out that he was betrayed by one of his friends.  Maybe his mistress is refusing to see him any longer.  Maybe he was disrupted in the middle of banging his friend because his mistress caught him and THAT'S WHY she doesn't want to see him any longer.  Who knows?

This is why I say Reaction Rolls Are Smarter Than You.  Friends that follow me and my thoughts on RPGs are well aware that I am a proponent of the idea that the emergent narrative is far better than any backstory or any predetermined on-rails adventure path.  I am even more adamant that using improvisational DMing tools such as reaction rolls, random encounters, and random tables will make any DM's game significantly better.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Player Experience: OSR vs 5e

-
Image
The Player Experience in 5E vs OSR, a Brief Comparison (Skip to next session if you want the bullet points) In Fifth Edition Dungeons & Dragons, player characters are heroes. From the very beginning, 5e PCs are well beyond the capabilities of the average populace.  They have above average ability scores, they get a full hit die + CON HP, Spellcasters start with several spells to choose from with multiple castings per day and cantrips they can use at-will. Martial classes start with benefits that put them significantly ahead of 1HD creatures, such as Fighting Styles, Second Wind, Martial Arts, etc. This also says nothing of the many skill proficiencies and expertise. This gap only increases as the game goes on. By contrast, games in the OSR tend to be far less charitable to starting characters. For a basis of comparison, we'll focus on Old School Essentials, as it's a direct retro-clone of one of the most foundational editions in the OSR, Moldvay B/X D&D from 1981.  What
Read more

Fighting Giants and Other Huge Creatures in D&D

-
Image
(Art by Satoshi Kamanaka https://www.artstation.com/artwork/X0xnL) Battles with enormous creatures should be epic, yes? Some of the most exhilarating fights in cinema, literature, and video games have been arduous, grueling battles between our heroes and these cowering Titans who obliterate entire buildings without even meaning to. Typically, in TTRPGs,  these combats are scarcely differentiated from combats with medium sized creatures that have massive amounts of hit points. Sure, there are size categories that have certain implications, and there are often hard hitting attacks or special abilities. But there's a lot of potential for greatness here that I believe isn't being capitalized on. For the sake of our purposes here, I'm going to be speaking in terms of 5e D&D mechanics, simply because it's incredibly easy to pare down to OSR standards, but is more widely understood. TIP ONE: PARTITIONING HP My first tip is to take that big ol' HP pool and b
Read more

Attack Cantrips Are The Worst

-
Image
Stop Pretending Harry Potter Magic Doesn't Suck Attack Cantrips are, by far, one of the most ill conceived leftovers from 4e's combat focused design. Truly, there is no real need for them in Fifth Edition. Nearly everything that could be looked at as a gap in design that necessitates these free damage tossers is addressed by some other aspect of the game. Here's why attack cantrips rustle all of my jimmies... They Belittle Mundane Attackers First thing's first. Your level1 caster doesn't expend any resources at all when they use a cantrip.  Anyone who uses ranged weaponry is suddenly at a disadvantage if they're tracking ammunition.  If you aren't tracking ammunition, there are many knockdown effects that follow, as demonstrated here:  Youtube: Why Resources Matter in D&D .  What about the melee attacker who decides to throw a weapon?  Are they expected to track THAT ammunition?  Yes?  Why?  Why is it that arrows are expected to be infinite, but daggers/
Read more